Talk:Robert Hawkins (artist)

Request Edit

edit

Plwase take this site down. I did not want this site to exist, and told the "author", Joseph S. Sheridan I did not want a Wikipedia page, but he did it without my permission. It is full of mistakes, mis-quotes, rumors and a very bad picture. Please remove it entirely. I have told Joe Sheridan to do so, but I told him not to do it in the first place, so I do not trust him to take it down, but have more hope for your people. Thank you in advance for your actions to remove the entry. ROBERT ODELL HAWKINS 07:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)92.16.217.65 (talk)

I contacted Wikipedia and researched policy for removal. It appears that Wikipedia prefers editing of any mistakes or mis-quotes. I am requesting information to create an article based solely on the truth. If the article can be removed because of the subject's concerns then I am requesting information on that process from other editors. Futuronyc (talk) 08:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Subject of article not happy about existence of page.

edit

Robert Hawkins, the subject of this article, contacted me personally throgh social media and asked me to remove this page on the grounds that he is not interested in a Wikipedia page about him. I explained to him Wikipedia's policies were to encourage editing as opposed to deletion. Can anyone advise on the protocol and rights of the subject? Futuronyc (talk) 08:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Is it part of his art practice to avoid publicity? Strangely, that photo you have uploaded of him seems to be a 'selfie', so I wonder how that can be your own work. Makes me wonder what's going on here! P.S. I've removed the variously alleged years/dates of birth because there clearly is a dispute about this. Sionk (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The birth date was correct.I don't know that it is a selfie, but I removed the photo...as that was a specific grievance of the subject. I am seeking information on the protocol for a subject requesting the removal of an article on them and their rights. Innthe meantime any information on making the article 100 percent factual is welcome. Futuronyc (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply