Talk:Richard Grayson (composer)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

picture edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

there is a photo of Richard Grayson on his homepage, but i don't know how to put it on wikipedia

http://faculty.oxy.edu/rgrayson/RGsmall.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.66.131.167 (talk) 04:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why Harvard citations edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I am curious why this article uses Harvard-style citations. Having authors and dates appear parenthetically in the prose interrupts the reading flow. I see this citation style used in marketing and social-science journals. As someone more accustomed to hard science journals (which use unobtrusive superscripts, like we use in most Wikipedia articles), I find parenthetical references to be an annoying affectation that serve no useful purpose — and they also seem inappropriate when citing newspaper articles rather than books. I tried changing them just now, but was reverted. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article was created that way, by me, as it happens, and I find Harvard citations prefereable for exactly the same reasons you prefer footnotes: Footnotes interrupt the reading flow, unlike Harvard references. Footnotes are an annoying affectation that serve no useful purpose, and I cannot for the life of me understand why you think it makes any difference at all whether books, newspaper articles, websites, films, or any other type of source is being cited.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. We have no guideline one way or another. Personal taste I suppose. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Exactly so. Very good of you to understand.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 04:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic