Talk:Religious trauma syndrome

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 July 2021 by reviewer AntanO (talk · contribs).

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Original Research: Does not appear to be in the DSM-V

Latest comment: 3 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This does not appear to be a recognized disorder in the DSM-V, so it seems this article uses original research. Please include sources not related to the people who have created/promoted this condition.It is would be best to say it is “proposed”. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomFrequentFlyerDent (talk • contribs) 06:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

With at present 64 references, this article is reasonably well sourced, though of course in a fast-changing field it will have to be updated from time to time. Nobody has created or promoted the condition; persumably you are referring to people who have done research on it. If you are suggesting we should not cite authorities who have researched the condition, that is an odd request. The only individual this article highlights is Winell, because she coined the term. But the article is not only based on her research. The specific point you mention is sourced to both Stone and Winnel in the head, and there is more evidence further down.--Doric Loon (talk) 09:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unclassified conditions or those with significant barriers may not appear in the DSM-V. There are several other highly-recognized conditions not included. There are no specific individuals or institutions "promoting" the disorder; it is a common, identifiable pattern. 66.182.125.193 (talk) 02:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic