Highly biased article, needs to be cleaned up, brought to Encyclopedia standards. 142.161.108.224 00:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Agreed — this article sounds more like a news column or blog than an encyclopaedia article. It is filled with assertions that are either pure opinion ("Authorities are undoubtedly more open and more responsive to users and to the communities around them than was the former operator," "a skilled ex-politician with a forthright, open manner") or use biased phrasing (e.g., "Federal government policy has been to burden airport authorities with high rents and other charges that force these authorities to apply user fees to passenger tickets in order to raise money for capital improvements" ). The article is further weakened by a dearth of facts and, of course, by the lack of citations. The sole source is a dead link. Mia229 (talk) 12:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
