Talk:Red River Valley Research Corridor

Selling NDSU short again?

NDSU is the larger research institution. You'd never know that from reading this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.242.82 (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure what you mean. This article contains material about research at both universities. If you feel that NDSU is somehow under represented, I would encourage you to include worthwhile material. --MatthewUND^(talk) 22:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering why NDSU is listed after UND. Is there a reasoning behind this? NDSU has a larger research budget and stronger research presence than UND. Is it just bias again, or some other actual fact or figures you're going by. Also I noticed that the picture on the page is a building that is not in UND's technology park. Any reason for including that as well? Possibly trying to make UND seem better? Sorry to keep bring these things up... but it should be addressed... If I get some time, I'll try to get an image or two of NDSU's tech park... MatthewNDSU (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Citations

Do I need to place citations after each paragraph or after each section that uses the same reference (as I did)? --NDState 03:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Generally, each paragraph can have multiple citations. It is often unlikely that one source will cover every claim made in a paragraph. --MatthewUND^(talk) 03:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Very nice additions in the NDSU area... thanks --NDState 04:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I've neglected this article in the past. I think we've been making some good improvements today. We certainly have improved the references! --MatthewUND^(talk) 04:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

It is looking a lot better. Thanks for your help. --NDState 04:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Red River Valley Research Corridor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theresearchcorridor.com/history.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ndsuresearchpark.com/info/park_stats.epl
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ndsuresearchpark.com/info/about.epl
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theresearchcorridor.com/research.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060920124116/http://www2.und.edu/our/news/story.php?id=1697 to http://www2.und.edu/our/news/story.php?id=1697

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)