Talk:Ram (film)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by CX Zoom in topic Requested move 29 September 2022
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 29 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Ram: Part 1. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 29 September 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 20:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Ram (film) → Ram: Part 1 – Split into two films, https://twitter.com/sri50/status/1547261148797407232?t=vaxHDVGGoTPnLKne7Av78g&s=19+2409:4073:103:E7B0:994:6C5B:919C:5900 (talk) 15:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Relister's comment: This technical request was done then contested. Copying over contester's comment and subsequent discussion from WP:RMT (contesting permalink). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Although there was unconfirmed reports that the film may have two parts, there's no change to the title, see the most recent poster. 2409:4073:4D8C:3BCE:79C8:B3CC:7859:CBC6 (talk) 07:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is technically a request to revert a technical move request from July 2022. Not sure which way we should go: revert first, then open a RM discussion? Open the RM without reverting (meaning a "no consensus" would result in the old Ram (film) title)? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- There were no comments in relation to it ([1]), so I'd say it should be treated as a request to revert an undiscussed move. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah. I have no issues with that treatment as well. :) – robertsky (talk) 19:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have moved the article back to
Ram (film)
and opened the above RM just to be safe, in the interests of page stability. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)- FYI, both the requests were made by myself. Sorry for the trouble.--2409:4073:4E00:E567:100C:6056:D1D3:4A81 (talk) 04:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have moved the article back to
- Yeah. I have no issues with that treatment as well. :) – robertsky (talk) 19:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- There were no comments in relation to it ([1]), so I'd say it should be treated as a request to revert an undiscussed move. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is technically a request to revert a technical move request from July 2022. Not sure which way we should go: revert first, then open a RM discussion? Open the RM without reverting (meaning a "no consensus" would result in the old Ram (film) title)? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. A little too soon, especially off a Twitter link. We can wait a month. SnowFire (talk) 04:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.