Talk:Rafiuddin Raz
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rafiuddin Raz article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I'm improving this article, give me a minute. (For the sake of love 04:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC))
+ Raz is one of the most important poets of Urdu poetry, today. (For the sake of love 06:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rk12m (talk • contribs)
Downgraded class listing after review edit
Dear Wiki editors, I have taken the liberty of downgrading this-and dont know why we use automatic sinebot type for such subjective categories-- I feel that there is , in fact, quite a lot of work to be done in improving this article, as it has some problems (a) it gives little or nothing of the poet's background and life (b) the language style and grammar usage can be improved considerably (c) basic structure and organisation of the article could do improved too and (d) further references would be useful. I hope that this change will not be construed wrongly, please but in the right spirit, of addding more valuable and higher quality material to really bring this into a B class. Thank you. Khani100 (talk) 21:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Khani100
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rafiuddin Raz/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Rated B on the quality scale because:
- All info is referenced. - Needs expansion, but reasonably covers topic. - Has a defined structure. - Has a useful infobox. - Is accessible. While there are some good points about this article, might I please say that it still needs considerable work, stylistically and in terms of further improvement of refs etc? I would personally not rate it as a B class article, but more in the upper C range, moving towards a B. Thanks Khani100 (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Khani100 |
Last edited at 21:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)