Talk:Radius of maximum wind

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Good articleRadius of maximum wind has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Radius of maximum wind/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Just one minor grammatical issue in the lead, which I fixed, otherwise it's a well-written article. I'm passing the article, nicely done DR. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

Should it be "Radius of maximum wind" or "Radius of maximum winds"? Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 22:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radius of maximum wind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Radius of maximum wind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply