Recent changes read like a company press release. This article needs to be reworked so that it reads less like an advertisment and more like an encyclopedia. MaxBrowne (talk) 07:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
- You're right. It was so much a glorification, consisting largely of WP:PEACOCK language and subjective expression and almost completely unsourced, that neutralizing it while preserving factual and verifiable information seemed more of a burden than anyone was likely to undertake. It seemed necessary to blow it up and revert to the pre-spam version. Largoplazo (talk) 10:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Surely the Seaboard Rise is distinctive, notable and innovative enough to be worthy of its own article? Stub Mandrel (talk) 11:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
