This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Talk:RATE project is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Could someone please explain why the sources cited by this article are problematic? Molpies! (talk) 04:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
This is an old thread, but WP:PRIMARY and WP:FRIND apply. On the other hand, at least right now, some independent sources are also used. —PaleoNeonate – 14:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
"Findings" did not seem to be adequate. I thought about "Apologetics" but it may be pushing a bit... I renamed it to "Claims" for now. That section also lacks inline citations. —PaleoNeonate – 05:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
There's always "Speculation". —PaleoNeonate – 05:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply