 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Răduleşti, Ialomiţa → Răduleşti –
- Where there are several Romanian villages and one commune of the same name, we typically consider the commune to be the main usage, and should do so here too. I've supplied a hatnote for the relevant disambiguation page. Biruitorul Talk 15:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- But Răduleşti (disambiguation) lists 5 places called Răduleşti, all in different counties. Let the plain name be the disambig page? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- We could do that, and it wouldn't be a big deal. It's just that we typically don't. See for instance Măgureni — that's the commune, and it has a hatnote for Măgureni (disambiguation), which shows the five villages with the same name. - Biruitorul Talk 00:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support, communes can always be expected to be primary usage over sub-commune villages, good to follow a consistent convention here.--Kotniski (talk) 10:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.