This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Is this the same person as Quintus Metellus Celer? If so, we could merge articles. If not, we seem to have some confusion about who was who and who did what. Haploidavey (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
It is indeed the same person. Quintus Metellus Celer thus should be merged into Quintus Caecilius Metellus Celer. The "Caecilius" is essential because that's his gens name. -- fdewaele, 10 April 2019, 11:15 CET.
Yes they should be merged. This user created 687 articles, 20 got deleted, and it could be worth going through that list. I found another duplicate of his here (of this article). T8612(talk) 11:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Bit of a bump, but let's go ahead. This article needs a lot of work, but merging the better parts of the other one into this one should be relatively easy. And this is the better title for it, between the two. P Aculeius (talk) 01:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
