Talk:Queer Appalachia

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 July 2021 by reviewer Worldbruce (talk · contribs).

Appalachia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Submissions citation

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I've cited the Queer Appalachia Wordpress site as a source verifying the claim about Electric Dirt submissions. Wiki is flagging this because it's a Wordpress site, but given that it's the page the zine is run through, it seems to be the most authoritative source available on the topic. I'm open to other suggestions but just wanted to put this here as an FYI. Uterodactyl (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think that should be fine as a source, I'd argue. Wikipedia usually flags stuff like that, unfortunately, per WP:SPS. --Historyday01 (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Got it, thanks for the input! Uterodactyl (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic