 | Q70 (New York City bus) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 6, 2018. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the M60 and Q70 bus routes in New York City were upgraded because LaGuardia Airport had no other rapid transit options? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Q70 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.example.com/map.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Q70 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160304025049/http://web.mta.info/busco/schedules/q070cur.pdf to http://web.mta.info/busco/schedules/q070cur.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Q70 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309014619/http://web.mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/160125_1030_Transit%26Bus.pdf to http://web.mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/160125_1030_Transit%26Bus.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160807045036/http://www.lgaunion.com/bid%20sheets%20fall%202016.pdf to http://www.lgaunion.com/bid%20sheets%20fall%202016.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304081652/http://web.mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/151214_1030_Transit%26Bus.pdf to http://web.mta.info/mta/news/books/pdf/151214_1030_Transit%26Bus.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Q70 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160628045252/http://gothamist.com/2015/11/23/lga_shuttle_bus.php to http://gothamist.com/2015/11/23/lga_shuttle_bus.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160618075215/http://gothamist.com/2016/06/15/laguardia_link.php to http://gothamist.com/2016/06/15/laguardia_link.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Q70 (New York City bus)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
On hold for 7 days (starting January 14/18)Passed!
- Pass or Fail:
- Reference #2 is dead.
Done
- For the table listing all the stops, I think it would help if the notes at the bottom turn into footnotes with links to the appropriate places. (Just like the note that is already in the article).
- Reference #4 seems to provide more recent data then what is presented on the wiki page (the wiki page uses 2015 data).
Done
--Dom497 (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Dom497: Thank you for reviewing the Q70 and M60 articles. I am also grateful to Kew Gardens 613 for fixing the issues in both of them. The only problem is that the notes in the tables (for both articles) are transcluded from the Select Bus Service page. epicgenius (talk) 01:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: I didn't look at the source code for that table at first but with what you've said it looks like this is something that needs a bigger discussion (outside of the scope of this review) if this change were to ever be made (which was ultimately just a suggestion). On that note, I will pass this nomination!--Dom497 (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)