This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Shouldn't "Put On A Happy Face" go to a separate page for the original song page itself, instead of merely to an album containing that song? Oscar Peterson is a true master and one of the all-time greats, for sure, but the only reason he did the song is because it was in Bye Bye Birdie first. This album page should be under "Put On A Happy Face (album)" and the original link should go to a separate page for the song itself, which certainly deserves its own page. It's certainly a well-covered standard with obvious staying power and cross-generational appeal. That does make sense, right? Chicobangs (talk) 21:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
It does make sense. Just do it. Be bold! Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
