Talk:Puck (magazine)

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Nitpyck in topic Punch

Contradictions edit

Compounding the utter lack of text cites is that the text contradicts itself. While one paragraph claims that "32-page issues" were "typical", the next claims that an issue "consisted of sixteen pages". This article has a long way to go, and Step No. 1 would be getting the facts straight, or at least consistent. No. 2 would be actual fact cites. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Punch edit

Was it an imitation of the famed magazine Punch?Nitpyck (talk) 07:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The "Politics and Religion" section in not sourced and the wording reeks of anti-Catholic bias. I nominate it be verified, edited or removed.Thank you LoneWolf1992 (talk) 1:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)