Talk:Pterodactyl Ascender

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jan olieslagers in topic Pterodactyl hangar weblink

Userbox edit

Any other editors who have soloed a Pterodactyl can put this box on their user page, if they so desire. - Ahunt (talk) 17:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Code Result
|{{User:Ahunt/Pterodactyl}}
 This user has soloed a Pterodactyl.
Usage

Pterodactyl hangar weblink edit

So sorry, but the weblink as it was and as had been reverted to really is not working for me, not when I changed it and not now, several hours later: <quote>Firefox kan de server op www.pterodactylhangar niet vinden.</quote> which amounts to a 404 error. I therefore humbly revert the last reversion. Besides, the address I found is the same as mentioned elsewhere in the text. Please let us not start an edit war, if I got it wrong please discuss here. Jan olieslagers (talk) 12:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I just checked http://pterodactylhangar.com/ and it is working fine and has been over the last month or so. I know the person who runs the website and so I do check it fairly regularly to see what has been posted there. Perhaps your ISP is having DNS problems resolving the address? The squarespace address works as well, but pterodactylhangar.com/ is the main URL. - Ahunt (talk) 13:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
this is what you insisted on reverting to, copied from your version of the page:

http://www.pterodactylhangar/ The Pterodactyl Hangar

(square brackets removed to avoid expansion) you can see the .com extension is missing. I can only presume you use some kind of web browser that tries adding various extentions automagically if the given URL fails, but not everybody uses the same browser. I will be streamlining the URL use to use the main adresses you mentioned. Greetings from across the big pond! Jan olieslagers (talk) 13:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing that - not sure where that came from missing the ".com" extension. - Ahunt (talk) 14:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
No thanks, it is nice to see some little furtive detail improved. Excuse me for whining like your gaffer: next time you revert someone's honest effort, first make sure. And/or discuss in the proper place. Please? Jan olieslagers (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yup, you are right! I shall endeavour to do so. - Ahunt (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks indeed! Enough whined, let's now sit back and relax. You prefer beer or genever? Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply