This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular CultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular CulturePopular Culture articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Section added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
It is proposed that this article be deleted, because of the following concern:
WP:NOT a usage guide, listcruft, OR
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mangojuice (talk • contribs) 05:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
I think there's value to this article, and cleanup would be more appropriate. I'm going to remove the proposed deletion tag now; nominate this as an AfD if you think it's beyond repair. --CRGreathouse 00:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
I marked it as original research. It was kind of interesting but I don't think an encyclopedia article can be written about what something might or might not be, when nobody really knows anything one way or the other. Redddogg (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
As of this revision was certainly OR, or at the least unreferenced; I’ve rewritten it in this edit as an article simply summarizing the content of the category (which articles are referenced), removing any speculation.
—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I concur with the above. As they say in Henan: "The tree which brings no lasting shade falls in a great storm." (CawCaw) (talk) 18:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.159.9.130 (talk) Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a pseudo-Japanese proverb going as follows "Viision without action is a day dream, action without vision is a nightmare". I think it suits well with the theme of the article.
Also the article needs to be reformed removing the prose line and adding the cultural context of asians being seen in the west as full of sagacity. Otherwise the content better belongs on Wikiquote. Spannerjam (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
