Talk:Prancing Horse

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 750h+ in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Prancing Horse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Marisauna (talk · contribs) 21:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 13:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this. Excited to review this; we need more automobile GAs. 750h+ 13:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

prose

edit
lead
  • The design was originally created by Francesco Baracca ==> "The design was created by Francesco Baracca"
  • as an insignia to be ==> "as an symbol/logo to be" (more understandable to others)
  • later gave Enzo Ferrari permission to use ==> "later permitted Enzo Ferrari to use"
  • predecessor—since 1932, and was applied to the company's remove the comma
history
  • which existed prior to the pilot's ==> "which existed before the pilot's"
  • Baracca family paid him a visit ==> "Baracca family visited him"
  • became the first car to utilize the rectangular replace "utilize" with "use", per an excellent essay written by Orwell that is still as valid today as it was then. He outlined his "Remedy of Six Rules" for writers. Number two is "Never use a long word where a short one will do.
  • good terms with the Baraccas, who were patrons of the ==> "good terms with the Baraccas, patrons of the"
  • Baracca family gave him permission to use ==> "Baracca family permitted to use"
  • at the Military Academy of Modena, and Enzo's older remove the comma
  • Enzo's own rationale for adopting remove "own"
other uses
  • the same woman who gave Enzo Ferrari permission to use the horse ==> "the same woman who permitted Enzo to use the horse"
  • a specialty automaker ==> " a speciality carmaker" (British English)
  • the logo is in fact derived ==> "the logo is derived"

sources

edit

Source review. Let's see:

  • Sources look of fine reliability
  • Consistently formatted
  • Spot check checks out.

Earwig shows an unlikely similarity figure of 6.5% to an openaccess.city.ac.uk source, so that's fine. Passing source review. I'd recommend archiving the sources via IABot. 750h+ 14:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

images

edit
  • One fair use image  Y
  • One public domain image  Y
  • One CC BY-SA 3.0  Y

Could you add WP:ALT text to all the images? Thanks. 750h+ 14:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll implement all the changes you've suggested, thanks. Do you have any other concerns? Marisauna (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Congrats on the new GA! 750h+ 03:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.