Talk:Portrait of a Creole Woman with Madras Tignon

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Cielquiparle in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 03:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Portrait of a Creole Woman with Madras Tignon (c. 1837), attributed to George Catlin
  • ... that the best-known presumed depiction of Louisiana Voodoo priestess Marie Laveau was copied from Portrait of a Creole Woman with Madras Tignon (pictured)? Source: "The image of Marie Laveau most often reproduced is the painting that now hangs in the Louisiana State Museum in the old Cabildo on Jackson Square. ... The present whereabouts of the original painting is unknown, and it is Schneider's copy that hangs in the Louisiana State Museum." Long, Carolyn Morrow (2006). A New Orleans Voudou Priestess: The Legend and Reality of Marie Laveau. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-8130-2974-0.

Created by Tcr25 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Portrait of a Creole Woman with Madras Tignon; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

1937 in infobox is typo for 1837? - but 1833 is mentioned in loan note? Hooks are OK but maybe we can make an even more clickbait one with voodoo- if I get an idea I will suggest. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yep, typo in the infobox fixed (thanks!). 1833 is what the annual report says. (It also says "C. Catlin" instead of "G. Catlin" and is listed as being a little smaller than the actual portrait is. But the picture in plate v of the report clearly shows the same painting.) I haven't seen any sources point out or explain those discrepancies. It is most likely an error/typo in the biennial report. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 11:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Checked new enough long enough and no copyvio as far as Earwig and I can tell. Thanks for nice article. I get "access denied" on source but accepting ALT2 as I cannot think of better. Good to go and I hope the great pic gets in too.   Chidgk1 (talk) 07:52, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply