Talk:Port of Hamburg

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Hamburg Habour edit

Hamburg's port is not called Hamburg Habour (please simply take a look on the official website). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.248.1.11 (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Requested move edit

This article has been renamed from Hamburg Harbour to Port of Hamburg as the result of a move request.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - move to standard name as per other articles. Keith D (talk) 00:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I propose that this article be renamed "Port of Hamburg":

  • It is the official name -- Port of Hamburg is the official name for the port (official website), which is administered by the Hamburg Port Authority (offical website)
  • It is the commonly-used name in the industry - Port of Hamburg is the name it is known by in ports and shipping publications and by governments ([1],

[2] and [3] to pick three from a lengthy list)

  • It is a standard nomenclature for Wikipedia ports articles - (Port of Singapore, Port of Rotterdam, Port of Hong Kong are three examples)
  • Hamburg Harbour is not commonly or relevantly used -- Hamburg Harbour is not commonly used in a ports or industrial context. Instead, it is used to describe the geographic feature of a harbour, and on tourism websites highlighting Hamburg's attractions. These uses are not relevant to this article, which is about the port and not the harbour. It is a truism to state that the tourism websites highlighting Hamburg Harbour are not referring to the heavy industrial complex that is the port.

This renaming has been proposed before in both 2006 and 2007, with several users in support and no opposition. However, nothing ever happened, I suspect because the redirect at "Port of Hamburg" makes a page move hard. The page was originally at Port of Hamburg but was moved without discussion by an anon IP a year ago. Since the redirect page has multiple edits it is not possible to move over the redirect to put the article back.

Other comments or views this time round are more than welcome. Euryalus (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • I have no further evidence to add; I support this move based on the arguments above. Knepflerle (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Port of Hamburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply