Talk:Pomorje

Littoral Serbia, Serbia Maritima? I need an opinion of interested editors

I have researched this term and I do not find it in foreign sources. This information is based on the book of the Serbian archaeologist Đorđe Janković. As far as I can see Đorđe Janković is mentioned in one Croatian review. I quote: " No, njegovi noviji radovi mene osobno podsjećaju na nešto uglađeniju verziju srbijanskog arheologa Đorđa Jankovića, čije je čitanje i tumačenje ranosrednjovjekovnih vrela s razlogom odbačeno od srbijanske arheologije i historiografije, mada je arheološka komponenta, kao i kod Sokola urađena prilično korektno...But his more recent work reminds me personally of a somewhat more refined version of Serbian archaeologist Đorđe Janković, whose reading and interpretation of early medieval sources was rightly rejected by Serbian archeology and historiography, although the archaeological component, as with Sokol, is done fairly correctly."(page 454) [1]

• Considering that this is a geographical name(Pomorje) of some area I think that this is very important term and such term should not be based on a single source or with sources of one historiography. It is, after all, a geographical area and I guess there must be more English sources talking about it. We know that there was a term and Venetian Albania, etc? I'm interested in what the editors think about it because if there are no English sources which confirm it, I think that this information should not be in the introductory part of the article as an indisputable fact.
• At the beginning of the 9th century, according to 822 entry of Einhard's Royal Frankish Annals, Serbs were ruling over "the greater part of Dalmatia" This information has nothing to do with "Pomorje". This information is from a historical record and it speaks of Roman Dalmatia, the sources citing this information do not talk about Pomorje so I suggest deleting this information from the article.
• Pomorje included most of the coastal regions of modern-day Montenegro, the southern regions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, notably most of Herzegovina region, and a southeastern part of region Dalmatia in Croatia. Regarding this information, in the book on page 59, this information does not exist. So it remains to be seen what this is all about. Mikola22 (talk) 15:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Pomorje / Littoral in Serbian title and context

This article is completely out of scope and inaccurately deals with a topic. Since the entry of "Primorje" into the title of Serbian monarchs, as it was inherited from the title and style of the Byzantine emperors, which, after all, is the case with the entire style in the Serbian title, it always meant the Greek coast, not the Dalmatian. As a toponim it never existed on the eastern coast of Adriatic Sea, not in medieval times, not later. When Serbian Kingdom exited to the Adriatic shores, title of Serbian monarch already inherited style from Byzantines, but that was a title which had nothing to do with a factual toponimia (toponymy) of the coastal regions they ruled (Montenegro, Herzegovina, Dalmatia), nobody called it "Pomorje" - it was just a coincidence, which means it cannot be defined, so it cannot be described.౪ Santa ౪^99° 18:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)