Talk:Polygar

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Proposed move edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This page should be moved to Polygar. That is the English term (and not Palaiyakkarar, which is the Tamil version), and that is what it is referred to as throughout the page. Hehest (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I agree that Polygar is the WP:COMMONNAME. I am now even more bemused because Sri Harsha Bhogi has just moved it to Palegars with the rationale that "move Palaiyakkarar to Palegars ‎(Polygar is the English term for Polygars but not Palaiyakkarar which is a Tamil term)". No way is Palegar the common name in the English language. And we do not pluralise words such as this. - Sitush (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes it should be moved to Polygar. Sorry but I was unable to move it to Polygar and when I was trying move it to Polygars still I got an error and accidentally I moved it to Palegars instead of Polygars. I was unable to move the page back and was stuck. Please help me with it. - Harsha 16:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sri Harsha Bhogi (talk • contribs)

No problem. I will sort it out for you soon. - Sitush (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am moving the page to "Poligar" because that is what I am seeing in RS^[1]^[2] and the Google Ngram viewer confirms that "Polygar" is an old spelling. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. I notice that there was a page called Poligar and User:Southernstar redirected it to this page in 2007. Southernstar, do you have any memory why this was done? There is nothing on the talk page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

^ The Cambridge History of the British Empire, CUP Archive, 1940, pp. 475–, GGKEY:55QQ9L73P70
^ Stein, Burton (1989), The New Cambridge History of India: Vijayanagara, Cambridge University Press, p. 43, ISBN 978-0-521-26693-2

Add topic

[1] The Cambridge History of the British Empire, CUP Archive, 1940, pp. 475–, GGKEY:55QQ9L73P70

[2] Stein, Burton (1989), The New Cambridge History of India: Vijayanagara, Cambridge University Press, p. 43, ISBN 978-0-521-26693-2

[1]

[2]