This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article alternates in tone between stating Genesius's theory as fact and hinting that it's been discredited. I take it that the question remains open and different editors have inserted their own opinions, but the article should be edited to reflect this.192.197.54.35 (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Not discredited; nevertheless, ambivalent. That elohim *may* mean "great god"; then again, it may also once have been a literal plural, considering the contentious role of Asherah in contemporaneous Canaanite religion.
