Talk:Pittodrie Stadium

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

The 'first' all-seated stadium

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

OK, I kind of expected this, and I do hope we don't get into any back-and-forth about it. Pittodrie was, in fact, one of the first, not the first. The word 'planned' is deliberate - the all-seated idea had been planned for some time, and was deliberately introduced. However, it was introduced close to a year after Clydebank had done it. The reason I make the distinction using the word 'planned' is that Clydebank were forced into their situation by an unexpected promotion - I've detailed all this on the All-seater stadium article.

I've used the Inglis book, as noted, as my source, although I do have a secondary source - my own experiences. I was there, and I can confirm that we were not the first. I'm pretty sure that really patient digging in the archives of the Press and Journal would turn up some corroboration for this, but I am as certain as it is possible to be that Pittodrie was not the first in Britain.

Incidentally, Inglis himself seems a little confused by the timing. I'm pretty sure (I don't have the bok to hand) that he does state somewhere that Pittodrie was the first. However, he does give a conclusive chronology in both the Pittodrie section and the New Kilbowie section which identifies Clydebank's ground as the first.

If it's any consolation (and any further honour to the memory of Chris Anderson - there's an article long overdue for creation), Pittodrie was intended to be the first all-seater, and was (if you accept the caveats) the first all-seated and all-covered ground in Britain. Watty1962 04:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've also read somewhere that Pittodrie was the first all seated and all-covered ground in the UK, which is not right as the stands by the South Stand weren't covered, but I agree that it wasn't the first all-seated ground in Britain. Certainly the best, though, in my own opinion :) Swaddon1903 08:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pittodrie Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic