Talk:Pieter De Crem
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mvuijlst in topic Controversies / NPOV
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Controversies / NPOV edit
Removed the following from the article. Grains of truth in here, but needs rewrite.
- Enormous controversy about his decision of redefining to mission of the Belgian troops in Afghanistan and his intention to send F16s in to battle.
- The fact that he seems to have used a UN top as an easy excuse to go to New-York could lead to his downfall. Although these allegation are not proven, De Crem has admitted he called the employer of 'the witness blogger' (bar in NY) while questioned in the Belgian chamber.
- The "NY-bar" incident even got worse when he claimed that bloggers are "dangerous" and should be limited. He warned his fellow politicians for the "dangerous bloggers".
Oh, and obviously, needs better English. :) Mvuijlst -- (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)