This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
1. In 430 there weren't Khmers in Central Vietnam. The earliest, linguistic evidence of Khmer would be in inscriptions of the 7th century.
2. Panduranga is a Cham polity. The first mentioning of Panduranga is in an inscription of the 12th century. However, Panduranga never was a Khmer state or polity - lying some hundred kms away from later Khmer territory.
Hence, the statement that he invaded Khmeric Panduranga is totally nonsense.Mahaparvata (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
