Talk:Peter Tinley

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sacalaz in topic Current article veto

Current article veto edit

Article nominated for cleanup as lacks neutrality, modified by Ptinley which concerns 'conflict of interest', and requires heavy citation of factual events and general Wiki cleanup. Feel free to discuss. Kind Regards, William --sacalaz —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC).Reply

Labor Party edit

The article states "Federal Opposition Leader, Kim Beazley, approached Tinley to represent the Federal Division of Stirling for the Australian Labor Party in the next Federal election[2]." Kim beazley is no longer the labour party leader having been replaced by Kevin Rudd. I changed the sentence to "Ex Federal Opposition Leader, Kim Beazley, approached Tinley in 2006 to represent the Federal Division of Stirling for the Australian Labor Party in the upcoming Federal election[2], 2007." Not the best sentence in the world but its more accurate. Feel free to modify --Spuzzdawg 02:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

JJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptinley (talkcontribs) 07:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rank? edit

Usual to give the rank at retirement of military personel. Anyone know his?--Mongreilf (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply