Talk:Peter Shurman
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article has been put together really haphazardly.
With Peter now running for a seat in the legislature is it possible someone could clean this up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.190.87 (talk) 03:27, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
References!
editFirst off, just wondering why there are so few references for this article?
undertaking an assignment to grow a minor Toronto paging company, into one of the area's largest and most important operators in only eighteen months
This is extremely vague.
Political Career: The article states that Shurman's election was due to the faith-based funding policy, which is correct, however it is incorrect to write that it was due to his support of it. Shurman never supported the faith-based policy, he just happened to be running in the right party at the right time (under John Tory) in the right riding (Thornhill). And here is a reference: http://yorkregion.com/News/Thornhill/article/53663
Anyway this article may be doing more harm than good right now, I hope a dedicated Wiki-er will clean it up. I really appreciate the work you guys do.
theripper - 99.237.215.17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.215.17 (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Redundant sentences that were redundant
editMy favourite poorly written sentence was in the "Chanuka Broadcast" section, which said "In 2005, Shurman made a speciah Chanuka special on the radio about Chanuka..." That's got to be the one of the worst sentences in Wiki-history. Anyways I've cleaned up that sentence at least. Had to mention it here for posterity though. Oh, and the subtitle said "Brodcast".
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.76.96 (talk) 04:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)