Talk:People's Monarchist Party (Portugal)

Untitled

Are they in the Assembly or not? -Mikedelsol 08:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

They are, but only because of what looks to me like electoral fusion. Anyway, if you want to tag articels as contradictory, use {{contradict}}, not just the template. Also thanx for explaining on the talk page. 68.39.174.238 22:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Broken link

The external link to the party's website appears to be broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.32.10 (talk) 23:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Do they support a claimant?

If Dom Duarte Pio is not a supporter of the PPM, do they advocate someone else should sit on the throne of a restored Portuguese monarchy? The heir of the Viseu line, perhaps ... or even Signor Poidimani? Jess Cully 11:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Right wing?

Apart from supporting monarchy, the party is a green party. I doubt that it is correct to call it a right wing party. More likely centre left.122.59.167.152 (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on People's Monarchist Party (Portugal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002035216/http://www.ppm.com.pt/ to http://www.ppm.com.pt/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002035216/http://www.ppm.com.pt/ to http://www.ppm.com.pt/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002035216/http://www.ppm.com.pt/ to http://www.ppm.com.pt/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)