Talk:Pennsylvania Route 402

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Juliancolton in topic GA Review
Good articlePennsylvania Route 402 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 11, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 402/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Writin's pretty good, but there are a few issues. Remove two of the tree mentions of local homes in the second paragraphs of the RD. Even after crossing the state line, Route 402 is mainly rural, with small breaks at at intersections with local roads. "at at"? Route 402 was assigned to most of its current routing in 1928, excepting for a piece at Pecks Pond, where it originally ran along the shoreline of the pond. "Excepting for a piece"? This intersection was a lot of the time congested "A lot of the time" is unencyclopediac writing. A Monroe County official reportedly admitted that the Marshalls Creek Bypass is the only project on the chopping block..." "chopping block" is more unencyclopediac writing.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    White Heron Lake is visible from the north... OR, not in source. Just north of Silver Lake Road, Pickerel Lake is visible to the west. More OR. Please remove or source mentions of things visible from the road.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Overall a good article, but there are some issues to be fixed. I've put the article on-hold. Good luck with improving it to GA status, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alright, looks like the issues have been addressed. Passes GA now. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply