Talk:Peninsula Link

SEITA

Article needs to say who they are and make clear they are not connected to the Vic Govt. Also needs better sourcing.--Grahame (talk) 02:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Although, they do have financial arrangements with the State Government, hence why they are being awarded the tender to another construction project going ahead under a PPP. Nick carson (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Peninsula Link

Has the name of the Frankston Bypass been changed to Peninsula Link? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrispain (talk • contribs) 07:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Merge with Mornington Peninsula Freeway

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Peninsula Link into the broader Mornington Peninsula Freeway for context and overlap. Klbrain (talk) 10:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

---

The merge would indicate the continuous link between the two sections of MP Freeway and Peninsula Link. Peninsula Link would have a sub-content on the MP Freeway page (if agreed upon). --Rom rulz424 (talk) 02:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

• Agreed, why there are two different articles for essentially one continuous road is a little confusing. Having the Peninsula Link article as a sub-section of the Mornington Peninsula Freeway article tidies a lot up. Lordstorm (talk) 06:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
• Also agree, it makes no sense having two articles for essentially the one Freeway. The article should be changed to the "M11" and then link both Mornington Peninsula Freeway and Peninsula Link to it. Both the MP Freeway and Peninsula Link should be sub sections under it. The same gos for other articles discussing freeways eg Frankston freeway/Eastlink/Eastern Freeway are all M3 so also should be one article.Anderch (talk) 02:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
• Personally I don't feel like it should be merged because the road has completely different financial structure to the rest of the freeway. The infobox could be retrofitted to suit it though. It used to be split in two sections so it can be split back into four. Jordf32123 (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

• Merge: On Vicroads map of declared roads and register of public roads, Peninsula Link is part of Mornington Peninsula Freeway, and serves as the local (a.k.a signposted) name of the 2013 section. My preference is to have the two articles merge, but given the quite extensive content of the Peninsula Link article, it may result in an unequal weighting of Peninsula Link in the merged article. Marcnut1996 (talk) 21:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

• Support merge, it is all the one road. Many roads are built in stages by different means over time. This does not make the stages or sections separately and independently notable. Due weight just means the other sections in the merge target perhaps should also be improved, as well some any minor detail trimmed from the merge subject. Aoziwe (talk) 05:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

• Support merge, as mentioned above by Marcnut1996 Peninsula Link is a part of Mornington Peninsula Freeway, it would like be having the Deer Park Bypass as a seperate article to the Western Freeway. I understand the financial funding is different to similar roads but any info in regards to this can be given in a subsection. Zach386x (talk) 02:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Support merge. It should be pointed out that separate articles don’t exist for the Metropolitan Ring Road and the Western Ring Road, to which there is a similar distinction between the Mornington Peninsula Freeway and Peninsula Link Notthatwise (talk) 11:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Peninsula Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080918031941/http://www.news.com.au:80/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24345655-661,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24345655-661,00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081018100601/http://www.news.com.au:80/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24503461-661,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24503461-661,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)