Talk:Paul Conway (butcher)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineePaul Conway (butcher) was a Agriculture, food and drink good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 21, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Failed GA edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article needs a bit of an expansion and an overhaul for the article. The other thing is that I am dubious about whether he meets notability standards, given that he only has 25 staff and has a turnover of about 1 million pounds. A real estate agent who sells 10 houses in Australia would have that much turnover

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Not applicable, there are none
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
  1. References are missing from some one sentence paragraphs
  2. Paragraphs should consist of more than one sentence. Please combine and integrate the one sentence paras or expand the article
  3. In general the article is very short - 2.5k of main prose. From the listed refs, there seems to be more scope for expansion
  4. Refs need to be formatted properly with full details of publisher, dates , author, see {{cite news}} and {{cite web}}.
  5. I do not think the PSYBT is a reliable source since Conway is one of their awardwinners and does promotions for them, so in effect he is in a partnership with them
  6. Lead is supposed to be a wrap-up of the main body. At the moment, the lead is basically more than the main body itslef.
  7. Refs need to be directly after teh punctuation, not before it.
  8. "in this highly competitive business" need sources
  9. "with overall Scottish third place" not correct English
  10. There are commas missing throughout the article

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paul Conway (butcher). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

How on Earth is this notable enough for an article? edit

It's an obvious vanity page, how has this been allowed to stay up? Why isn't there a page for every butcher, baker, candlestick enthusiast etc. in Scotland?