Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Curlymanjaro in topic Prose Suggestions

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Criteria edit

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

  • 1
    1.a  Y
    1.b  Y
  • 2
    2.a  Y (All references are either self-contained or have bibliography.)
    2.b  Y
    2.c  Y
    2.d  Y (Highest is 9.9, due to name of source, and incidental phrases.)
  • 3
    3.a  Y
    3.b  Y
  • 4
    4.a  Y
  • 5
    5.a  Y
  • 6
    6.a  Y
    6.b  Y
  • No DAB links  Y
  • No Dead links  Y
  • Images appropriately licensed  Y

Prose Suggestions edit

  • although the beginning has since been lost. Does this mean the beginning was lost before the Papyrus was found? If so, I suggest a change to although the beginning of the papyrus was lost before it was found.
  • It is the only of the Oxyrhynchus Papyri presently held in the university's collection suggest It is the only Oxyrhynchus Papyri currently held by the university's collection.
  • if not already orphaned or discarded does discarded here mean left to die? If so I would recommend you specify that.
  • If this stipulation was transgressed, the typical punishment was confiscation of private property. to what extent? Would the slave be taken? Would a certain value worth of property be taken?
  • Financial declaration of slaving sales should this be slave sales, or does source use slaving sales?
  • @Curlymanjaro: That is all my comments. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Done; thanks so much for your comments. Curlymanjaro (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply