|This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.|
|WikiProject Computing / Software||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Internet||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
RESTful API Description Language?Edit
- No, because there's no such thing. Especially not as a proper noun phrase, thus capitalised.
- The problem is that these are a subset of IDL (Interface Description Languages), a notable term that should be capitalised. Yet this subset has no objective definition by objective sources. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
HATEOAS is the key pillar of a RESTful API, not an "alternative"Edit
- "An alternative approach to building RESTful APIs is known under the acronym HATEOAS..."
- Alternative? A world of no, it is key:
- The definitive source:
- Yes, I know when people use the term "REST API" in colloquial conversation they often ignore this, c'est la vie, but in an article that purports to define things, the definitions should be try to be correct, and not purposefully misleading....
- I'm not suggesting that we change the name of the article, but I am suggesting that, if we're going to have a section on HATEOAS, we point out that this is an area where theory and reality often contradict, that "RESTful" IDL's often go against the original spirit of REST (but not necessarily), and not stoop to misdirection and spin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Article needs cleanup or deletionEdit
As an example, § List of Restful API DLs would be better written as tabular data instead of list data, and I'm fairly certain that TvojaStara attempted to link his own repository in an edit to this article on 4 November 2015 (which, as an aside, points to a stale/inactive repository that hasn't been updated since 2017, and the site linked there doesn't even have a domain name record in any DNS server I've looked up). Echohawkdown (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)