Talk:Optonica

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

A good start

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is an good start for what could be an excellent article. But it has a few problems.

no cites. It mentions sources, but it's unclear what's coming from where.
it offers too many unattributed opinions. Wikipedia doesn't declare what's remarkable or beautiful. It states facts and leaves the opinions to others.
the tone is just a bit too much like an essay of personal observations
it overreaches in deciding what motivated Sharp, and what the legacy of Optonica is. Again, this is not for Wikipedia to decide.
it uses weasel words, like "probably" and "considered"

--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Main reference

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A reference is obviously needed for Optonica sales catalogue OP-FB 10/77
--Brenont (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic