Talk:Operation Concrete
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Operation Concrete appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Release
editIs there any confirmation on when this film was released specifically? Some say 1955, some say 1958, does anyone or any source refer to a specific context of release (festival, before a feature-length film, etc.)? YouCanDoBetter (talk) 23:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk 13:55, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Jean-Luc Godard credited neither his writer nor assistant on his first short film?
- Source: Brody, Richard (2008). Everything Is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard (1. ed ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books, p. 33. ISBN 978-0-8050-6886-3.
- ALT1: ... that while shooting his first short film, Jean-Luc Godard was barred from his mother's funeral for stealing? Source: Brody, Richard (2008). Everything Is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard (1. ed ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books, p. 33. ISBN 978-0-8050-6886-3.
- Reviewed:
Lbal (talk) 23:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC).
- Starting review. Updates to follow. Ktin (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria. No issues with tone. Referencing seems alright, but, is sourced to offline sources. I will AGF on those offline sources. Assuming AGF on plagiarism checks as well. No QPQ needed.
Both hooks are interesting. However, to validate both of the hooks, please can I get the relevant sections from the offline sources quoted here? Ktin (talk) 05:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
User:Ktin Hi, sorry if my reply is not properly formatted, I'm still working on learning some aspects of Wikipedia. I've linked a Google Books copy of the source at the bottom of the page itself in the Works Cited section, but it is also at this link as well: https://books.google.com/books?id=Nf_uKU6bYRYC&pg=PA25&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbal (talk • contribs) 19:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- No problem on the formatting. Let me take a look at the Google Books preview. Ktin (talk) 01:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Validated both hooks using p33 of the Google Books Preview. Good to go. Ktin (talk) 01:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)