Talk:Open Knowledge Repository
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from Open Knowledge Repository appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the World Bank's Open Knowledge Repository was called "one of the most important hubs for economic scholarship in the world" by Creative Commons? Source: Team Open
- ALT1: ... that the World Bank's Open Knowledge Repository endeavors to be "the world’s most complete research and knowledge repository related to international development"? Source: "An Overview of the Open Knowledge Repository"
- ALT2: ... that the Open Knowledge Repository collects the intellectual output of the World Bank in digital form, disseminates it, and preserves it long-term? Source: COAR, MacOdrum Library
Created by Michael Barera (talk). Self-nominated at 03:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC).
Nominated for DYK two days after creation, and somewhat shy of 5000 bytes, satisfying date and length criteria. Article has been properly sourced. Hooks are of reasonable length and properly sourced. However, ALT2 may be a bit dull for a general audience, and ALT1 is an aspirational goal stated by the "Senior Publishing Officer and Head of Marketing at The World Bank Group Publications" so may not qualify for DYK. The QPQ review has been completed. Mindmatrix 00:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
