 | Only in the Way has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 16, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Only in the Way/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
I will complete this soon JAGUAR 19:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria edit
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
- I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
- Nothing on the Production in the lead, despite the section being scarce the lead must summarise, even if it's minor
- The plot summary in the lead is quite extensive
- Is the list of people in the production sentence a definite list of people who worked on the film? The lead says otherwise
- The red link in the lead should be removed
- "Old folks" is informal
- Triple quote error in reception
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- The assertions regarding the cameramen could be original research, but both candidates are included in the reference given.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Well researched and mostly well written, once again. Nothing major so it can be put on hold. I am passing this on the grounds of good research. I expressed some concern with organisation, but I've done some tidying up if that's OK. 
JAGUAR 15:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)