This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The assertion that the Ohalo site pushes back the beginning point of the Neolithic Revolution is controversial - it does show evidence of early cereals collection and consumption, but not the domestication of these wild cereals, which is the hallmark of the "neolithic revolution" theorem. After looking over the sources cited, I don't think any of them would make this bold claim either - it seems to me just an oversimplification of the significance of the find. If there are not any complaints, I will probably find some sources to back me and and change that. Florimell1919 (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Florimell1919 (Becks)Reply