Talk:OTV-4

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

On 11 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from USA-261 to OTV-4. The result of the discussion was moved.

Orphaned references in USA-261

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of USA-261's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "n2yo":

From SpaceX CRS-5: "DRAGON CRS-5 Satellite details 2015-001A NORAD 40370". N2YO. 12 January 2015. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
From ABS-3A: "ABS 3A Satellite details 2015-010A NORAD 40424". N2YO. 19 March 2015. Retrieved 19 March 2015.
From Fox-1A: "FOX-1A (AO-85)". n2yo.com. Retrieved 2018-06-25.
From Eutelsat 115 West B: "EUTE 115 WEST B (SATMEX 7 Satellite details 2015-010B NORAD 40425". N2YO. 6 June 2016. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
From BRICSat-P: "BRICSAT-P (NO-83)". n2yo.com. Retrieved 2018-06-26.
From Ekspress AM7: "EXPRESS AM7 Satellite details 2015-012A NORAD 40505". N2YO. 21 April 2015. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
From SpaceX CRS-6: "DRAGON CRS6 Satellite details 2015-021A NORAD 40588". N2YO. 19 April 2015. Retrieved 19 April 2015.
From Kounotori 5: "HTV-5 Satellite details 2015-038A NORAD 40873". N2YO. 25 August 2015. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
From Cygnus CRS OA-4: "Cygnus ORB-4". N2YO.com. 9 December 2015. Retrieved 9 December 2015.
From ParkinsonSAT: "PARKINSONSAT (PSAT NO-84)". n2yo.com. Retrieved 2018-06-26.
From USA-240: "OTV 3 (USA 240) Satellite details 2012-071A NORAD 39025". N2YO. 13 August 2014. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
From IRNSS-1D: "IRNSS 1D Satellite details 2015-018A NORAD 40547". N2YO. 10 May 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.

Reference named "guardian20141017":

From USA-240: "Secret space plane lands at US air force base after unknown two-year mission". The Guardian. Associated Press. 17 October 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
From Boeing X-37: "Secret space plane lands at US air force base after unknown two-year mission". The Guardian. Associated Press. 17 October 2014. Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:USSF-52 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic