This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
I will review this soon, hopefully leading to you having the last GA required to nominate the Notes on a Conditional Form GT! --K. Peake 16:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review! This is the last one, so hopefully GT soon! Giacobbetalk 18:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
"said the song's creation was" → "said parts of the song's creation were"
The notes do not appear to show him mentioning artists failing to take a stance, unless I misinterpreted it?
"I find that a lot of people who are out there doing their thing musically, who aren’t challenging any ideas, are only made interesting through association or projection. I don’t feel like a lot of people stand by stuff." I just paraphrased the last sentence. Giacobbetalk 12:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
"praising its "grandeur" → "praising the "grandeur" to avoid using "it" or "the song" too close to the last instances
"while noting it explores" → "while noting the song explores"
Why is Kitty Empire mentioned as writing for The Observer when this review was clearly a piece for The Guardian?
"for the band." → "for the 1975."
"the album's "more successful" → "the album's "[m]ore successful"
"saying: "The 1975 are" → "saying it is an example of where "[t]he 1975 are"
"radio-friendly hooks."" → "radio-friendly hooks"." per MOS:QUOTE
Three reviews in one sentence is too much so give the musicOMH one its own sentence: "On a similar note, Ross Horton of musicOMH called it" or "called the bridge" if the source mentions that part specifically
"deconstruction of the band's" → "deconstruction of the 1975's"
Make the Pitchfork review its one sentence per my earlier comment
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; looks like the last GA for the album is coming up!!! --K. Peake 08:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
(CA)Giacobbe Regarding my comment about writing out the producers and songwriters in the body, I suggest the opening section. --K. Peake 15:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Kyle Peake: Hey, my apologies I had an exam. Added that part. Regarding the archive tool, it appears to be down at the moment. Giacobbetalk 18:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
(CA)Giacobbe✓Pass now, the archives not being able to be added is not an issue since the tool often breaks and you can do this at a later date. Good luck with your GT, plus it is fine that your exam caused a delay – I'll be on here less now that I start work at McDonald's in three days! --K. Peake 18:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply