This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As I read the bill, if the Executive is formed on Monday 21 October, then the larger part of the bill's clauses to not apply, the article says that it must be by 21 October (apparently not allowing 21 October).Naraht (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, I've reviewed this page. The neutrality and empty section tags were already there. As far as I can see, the empty section is the only issue, whoever placed the neutrality tag did not elucidate on the talk page, so for its removal please look for it in the edit history and discuss it with them below. Other than that, this looks ready..
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Not sure why there is a NPOV maintenance tage here, placed by @LongIslandThomist914:. I have removed the tag per WP:MTR and WP:TC. If there is an issue, please re-tag the article and write the exact reason why you think it is biased (Don't do "drive-by" tagging). Please remember, the article being biased is different to the act being biased - Wikipedia is here simply to accurately report the Act, regardless of personal belief on the matter. I also note that the reviewer concurred that the article is neutral. Legendiii (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
