A fact from Northeast Arm Iron Range appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Talk:Northeast Arm Iron Range is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG, use of flag icons in the infobox here is incorrect. I appreciate that other articles also make that mistake, but OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument in favour of doing it. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Dan O'Connor who would become prominent in areal mining and prospecting. Does areal mining mean mining an area? Or is it a typo of aerial (except that aerial mining usually means dropping naval mines from aircraft)? Maybe there's a better word for it? – Reidgreg (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Reidgreg: I did some rewording. How is it now? Volcanoguy 22:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Volcanoguy: Looks good; I added two commas and a hyphen. The only problem I see is this sentence: Ultramaficlithologies required to generate high-pH fluids are not present, suggesting that chert and iron oxide deposition was unlikely controlled by pH fluctuations caused by mixing of alkaline hydrothermal fluids with seawater. It could prove a bit tough for some readers. The adjective unlikely doesn't work well with the verb controlled. You could put "to have been" between these words but it might be better to rephrase, though I don't want to change the intended meaning. (Was it controlled but controlled in an unlikely manner, or are there scientific doubts of a regulating relationship?) Also, could the last part of the sentence be simplified as: "by the pH fluctuations of alkaline hydrothermal fluids mixing with seawater." – Reidgreg (talk) 01:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Reidgreg: I am not sure of a better way to rephrase that sentence, though I did add "to have been" between unlikely and controlled to make it sound better. Maybe User:Vsmith could help. Volcanoguy 22:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me. Vsmith (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
