Talk:Noerr–Pennington doctrine

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed analogies to tort edit

I removed the following paragraph from the article:

The lower courts have generally applied the Noerr-Pennington doctrine or an analagous principle to other situations where a party is sued for attempting to influence government officials to take official action. For example, land developers and other business interests sometimes bring tort suits for e.g. intentional interference with contractual relations against community members who have opposed their building permits. These "SLAPP suits" are frequently dismissed on First Amendment petition clause grounds with or without cites to the Noerr-Pennington cases. The Supreme Court has not definitively spoken on this practice.

It seems to be outside the scope of the topic. The Noerr-Pennington doctrine only applies to antitrust cases, not to tort cases or other frivolous lawsuits, and the "sham proceedings" exception should only be discussed as it applies to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. The preceeding paragraph might be better suited to the abuse of process article. -- BD2412 ^talk 17:15, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Actually, that is incorrect. Noerr-Pennington has been applied to abuse of process suits. Brownsville Golden Age Nursing Home, Inc. v. Wells, 839 F.2d 155, 159-60 (3d Cir.1988).

Add topic