Talk:No Treason

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 97.73.64.154 in topic No Mention of Abolitionism

Three

edit

There were three essays in the No Treason series. The Constitution of No Authority was the third and last of them, inexplicably titled No Treason No. VI. The others were No Treason No. I and No Treason No. II. Since the article is titled No Treason, it should cover all three essays in the series. 184.19.97.101 (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The titles of the three essays

edit

I added a new external link for the three essays. Please note that the numbering is not a typographical error. The three essays are correctly given as follows:

No Treason: No. 1
No Treason: No. II: The Constitution
No Treason: No. VI: The Constitution of No Authority

The first, alone, does not use Roman numerals.

50.194.104.82 (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

No Mention of Abolitionism

edit

Given the subject matter of opposition to the treason claims levied against Southern soldiers, the Civil War, and the involuntary Union, shouldn't Spooner's ardent abolitionist views be mentioned to give this article proper context? I say it is absolutely essential. Otherwise he could be easily painted as pro-slavery, a racist, or pro-Confederacy. He was none of those things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.73.64.154 (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply