Talk:No Treason
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three edit
There were three essays in the No Treason series. The Constitution of No Authority was the third and last of them, inexplicably titled No Treason No. VI. The others were No Treason No. I and No Treason No. II. Since the article is titled No Treason, it should cover all three essays in the series. 184.19.97.101 (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
The titles of the three essays edit
I added a new external link for the three essays. Please note that the numbering is not a typographical error. The three essays are correctly given as follows:
- No Treason: No. 1
- No Treason: No. II: The Constitution
- No Treason: No. VI: The Constitution of No Authority
The first, alone, does not use Roman numerals.
50.194.104.82 (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
No Mention of Abolitionism edit
Given the subject matter of opposition to the treason claims levied against Southern soldiers, the Civil War, and the involuntary Union, shouldn't Spooner's ardent abolitionist views be mentioned to give this article proper context? I say it is absolutely essential. Otherwise he could be easily painted as pro-slavery, a racist, or pro-Confederacy. He was none of those things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.73.64.154 (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)