Talk:No. 5, 1948
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 97.124.104.102 in topic Why is the image so low quality and low resolution?
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from No. 5, 1948 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Comments
editSo Blue Poles is worth somewhere between 770,000 dollars and 180 million - interesting. Yeah
- Around 770,000 American dollars = 180 million Australian dollars.--TBCΦtalk? 23:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- The NY Times Article is for Members only! I cannot read ist.
- I replaced $770,000 with $A180 million, as that was the figure mentioned in the newspaper article. Gareth E Kegg 00:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
So much talk about the price of the painting, very few words about its artistic value, I think this article need to be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.245.214.27 (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think the article covers the painting's artistic value in its entirety (i.e. none) 88.104.57.78 (talk) 13:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Why is the image so low quality and low resolution?
editCan someone upload a better version? 97.124.104.102 (talk) 15:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)