Talk:Nino Porzio

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 188.108.240.224 in topic This is clearly edited by the same artist

Motivation for speedy deletion edit

Having checked ALL the references as disinformative, erroneous, confuse and most of them non valid even to perform a minor check. I have no other way to proceed than deletion or discussion on notability. Top issue is the unreferenced concert in the Kolnische arena where madonna gathers 14000. A perfect unknown compilation artist gathers 9000 people.--176.4.70.120 (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I read and re-read the notability section and I still don't believe a compilation artist without references (most of them are invalid, fake, self-produced or irrelevant). And it is for months that I am asking for references.--176.4.70.120 (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Checked non-secondary sources... not found anything...--176.4.70.120 (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
  1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] Not multiple, not reliable, present though in multiple music networking/e-marketing sites or business - for some of them he asked explicitly for commertial evaluation see CBS which is an irrelevant music evaluation network but here "erroneously" reports to the Southern California City News
    • This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following:
      • Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3]
      • Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.
      • Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.
  2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.: None of the charts proposed are relevant as per national music chart
  3. Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.: Reference to sort of Gold in one of the charts for misinformation
  4. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.[note 4] Not found
  5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable). Not found, can be found in mp3 sales aggregators
  6. Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 5] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. No
  7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. No
  8. Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award. No
  9. Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition. No
  10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E for further clarifications) No, in the television shows Nino works as a secondary actor (without references though)
  11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. No
  12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network. No

Note that members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases. Singers and musicians who are only notable for participating in a reality television series may be redirected to an article about the series, until they have demonstrated that they are independently notable. --176.4.70.120 (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC) I'll go for speedy deletion again, and dear wikipedia friends, sorry too much to be so stubborn against this puppetsocketeer. Writing and checking guidelines will keep me controllable, don't worry--176.4.70.120 (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Replacing when not possible: Even if the user told me yes, I don't believe any of the points above are covered, and I have been given no reason. Well documented maintenance move, but I was lacking a rationale, thanks.--176.4.70.120 (talk) 18:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is clearly edited by the same artist edit

All references are pointing to websites from the same artist. Other one commercial listing of dubious importance. Let's not put whoever that has a job as if it was encyclopedic.--188.108.240.224 (talk) 10:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).