Talk:Nicolas Bacri

Speedy delete

The text on this page has not been copied from another site. The sorted list of the works have been put in order of the Opus Number. The Titles of the pieces have been translated into English. Swanstone 20:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I contest this speedy delete. He us obviously worthy of inclusion and would survive afd. The speedy deleter is far too ready to speedy delete tags rather than discuss or improve. - Kittybrewster (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I've declined the speedy, but the article is a mess and needs to be cleaned up with some context. It could use more biographical information and less of a list of every opus he's ever written.--Isotope23 17:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nicolasbacri.net/biographieen.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 14:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

• Note that even if permission were received, material pasted directly from websites, press releases, etc. is almost invariably promotional and lacking in encyclopedic style and tone. It would still require heavy editing to bring it into line with our Manual of Style and key principles of Neutral point of view and Verifiability. Voceditenore (talk) 14:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed again

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nicolasbacri.net/biographieen.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

• Note (ance again!) that even if permission were received, material pasted directly from websites, press releases, etc. is almost invariably promotional and lacking in encyclopedic style and tone. It would still require heavy editing to bring it into line with our Manual of Style and key principles of Neutral point of view and Verifiability. Voceditenore (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)