Talk:New Policies (Song dynasty)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China Stub‑class

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

i was surprised that this page didn't already independantly exist, only within the Wang Anshi page so i coppied it from there. major adjustments are needed.

The reason why the reforms failed edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Because to a certain extent, the reform was out of date, the actual operation effect was not good, and people opposed it. The fundamental reason is that the policies touched the interests of nobles and landlords, they severely opposed these policies. The above paragraph must be added. This is true and well-documented. Chinese historical documents and textbooks are written in this way. That's actually the case. Xiaofan123456 (talk) 13:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Xiaofan123456, I think that the main problem is that it's not clear what you are trying to say. For example, what does it mean that the reform was "out of date" and what is "operation effect"? Alaexis_¿question? 16:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Cambridge History of China (volume 5, part 2, p. 152) reads as follows

“

Nevertheless, these and other reforms aroused very powerful opposition throughout oficialdom. Ideological positions on, for example, the role the government should or should not play in economic affairs undoubtedly played a part. But it is hard to resist the feeling that the very process of implementing the reforms proved to be the major obstacle to their success. Wang, supremely conident that his policies conformed to the principles established by the sages (sheng-jen), made a series of mistakes that have frequently bedeviled even the best of policies, in China and elsewhere.30 In the irst place, instead of an incremental, gradual implementation of the policies,Wang hit the bureaucracy with a rapid series of major innovations, triggering widespread opposition that also grew with great speed.31 Moreover, believing that policies properly grounded in the teachings of the sages must of necessity have good results,Wang was not given to reconsiderations when certain measures did not work out well or produced unintended consequences. Nor was he open to critical advice from below which might have led to a smoother implementation of better-designed policies.

”

Did you refer to these operational difficulties? Alaexis_¿question? 16:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic